Surgery: Open Access - Sci Forschen

Full Text

Research Article
Is HMG-Co A Reductase Inhibitor Use Associated with Improved Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Resection?

  JJR Richardson1,2*      C Roberts-Rhodes1      NR Suggett2      F Gao-Smith1      DR Thickett1   

1Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
2Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom

*Corresponding author: Richardson JJR, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. E-mail: jonathan.richardson@nhs.net


Abstract

Purpose: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) modulate the immune system and have anti-inflammatory effects. It has been proposed that their use in the peri-operative period may reduce surgical complications by modulating the post-operative pro-inflammatory response. This study aims to evaluate the effect of statins on surgical outcomes following colorectal cancer resection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all colorectal cancer resections performed at University Hospital Birmingham, between June 2008 and July 2013, was conducted. Patients were divided into ‘Statin Users’ and ‘Non-statin Users’. Their outcomes and survival were evaluated using univariate, multivariate and cox-regression analysis.

Results: 246/703 patients (35.0%) were statin users. There were no differences in disease stage between the groups. Statin users were found to have a higher proportion of colonic, compared to rectal, cancers than non-statin users (60.2% vs. 48.1%, p=0.0023) and a reduced incidence of stoma formation (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95, p=0.0280). Despite significant increases in age, BMI and co-morbidity, statin users had equivalent rates of complications, re-operations, re-admissions and mortality than non-statin users. Statin users were however more likely to be admitted to Critical Care (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.16-2.87, p=0.0090) and have a prolonged hospital stay (12% increase in LOS, 95% CI=0.002-0.10, p=0.0420). No significant dose related differences were identified in patient outcomes and mortality were observed, although an overall risk reduction in mortality with increasing dose of statin remains possible (HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.41-1.09, p=0.1100).

Conclusions: Statin users achieved equivalent short-term and long-term outcomes to non-statin users despite an increased operative risk and their use in the peri-operative period, particularly at high doses, merits further investigation.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Patient outcomes; Statins; Surgery


Introduction

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been extensively studied and have proven efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a variety of populations [1- 6]. Their main mechanism of action is reduction of serum cholesterol by means of competitive inhibition of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, which is the rate limiting enzyme in the mevalonate synthesis pathway. Consequently, statins reduce the intermediate products of cholesterol synthesis, namely mevalonate and the down-stream isoprenoid intermediaries, which play a vital role in several intracellular signalling pathways leading to a reduction in endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis and a reduction in low-density lipoprotein which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease [7-12].

The cholesterol independent effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition are known as ‘pleiotropic’ effects. These pleiotropic effects (anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory, anti-platelet, antithrombotic, protective against oxidative stress, anti-microbial [12-21]) are thought to counteract the detrimental effects of inflammation. In fact, statins have been demonstrated to reduce the release of proinflammatory mediators (C-reactive protein [CRP], Tumour Necrosis Factor-α [TNF-α], Interleukin-6 [IL-6], Interleukin-8 [IL-8] in both animal and in-vitro studies [12-14]. Evidence from human trials has demonstrated improved outcomes in subjects with hypercholesterolaemia, cardiovascular disease and bacterial infections with statin induced CRP reduction [15-18] and a reduced incidence of major cardiovascular events in healthy individuals without hypercholesterolaemia but with elevated CRP levels [6,19]. Interestingly, a dose dependent anti-inflammatory response has been observed where patients taking high-dose statins were found to have reduced levels of CRP following Acute Coronary Syndrome [20] and reduced periodontal and carotid inflammation in periodontal disease [21].

It has been suggested that statins may influence cancer risk by means of cancer chemoprevention. Statins, in pre-clinical studies, have been demonstrated to exert anti-neoplastic effects (pro-apoptotic, antiangiogenic, immune-modulatory) which may prevent cancer growth [22,23]. Observational studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated a reduced risk of prostate, hepatocellular, gastric and oesophageal cancer associated with statin use [24-27]. Statins have also been investigated in the context of a potential role in the modification of cancer outcomes and mortality and it is has been demonstrated that patients who take statins prior to their cancer diagnosis are less likely to die from any cause or specifically from cancer [28].

The relationship between statins and colorectal cancer has been investigated, but the results are inconclusive both with regard to cancer risk, cancer outcomes and mortality. Epidemiology studies have examined the risk of colorectal cancer with conflicting results from very protective [29] to moderately harmful [30]. A recent meta-analysis of 40 published studies, involving more than eight million subjects, concluded that statins did not strongly reduce the overall risk of colorectal cancer in the general population at low doses used for managing hypercholesterolaemia and cardiovascular disease. There was, however, evidence to suggest an overall risk reduction with statin use although this was not significant [31].

Following major cardio-vascular surgery a reduction in postoperative cardiac complications and a reduction in post-operative infective complications has been documented in patients taking statins pre-operatively [32-36]. Interestingly a dose dependent modulation of inflammation has been observed in coronary artery surgery where highdose statins, in combination with high-dose ACE-inhibitors, almost completely prevented the systemic inflammatory response associated with surgery and virtually entirely suppressed surgery related changes in plasma concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 from 10 minutes up to 24 hours after aortic clamping [37].

In the context of general surgery, pre-operative statin use has been independently associated with a decreased risk of major, non-cardiac complications, respiratory complications, venous thrombo-embolic events and infective complications [38-40]. Overall, the pre-operative use of statins appears to be associated with a reduction in major complications [38,39].

Specifically in the context of colorectal surgery, statin use is associated with a significantly lower incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and a lower incidence of surgical site infection [40]. There appears to be no difference however in overall mortality, total complications or median hospital length of stay between statin users and non-statin users undergoing major colorectal resection [38,39]. Studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding the association of perioperative statin therapy and anastomotic leak and a beneficial effect of peri-operative statin therapy on the incidence of anastomotic leak cannot be ruled out [41,42]. Patient’s taking peri-operative statins appear to have a greater baseline peri-operative risk compared to non-statin users, but they achieve equivalent outcomes overall suggesting that peri-operative statin therapy may indeed be of benefit and reduce morbidity after elective colorectal resection [40,42].

It is well established that infectious complications in patients with cancer are associated with adverse oncological outcomes independent of the morbidity associated with the infectious insult [43-46] and they are associated with an increased mortality as a consequence of metastatic disease [46-50]. It has been proposed that the use of statins in the perioperative period may reduce surgical complications by modulating the post-operative pro-inflammatory response.

It seems logical to think that statins could be advantageous in the setting of cancer surgery where they might reduce systemic inflammation and post-operative complications with a consequent improvement in oncological outcomes. It was therefore decided to investigate whether statin use is associated with reduced post-operative complications and improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection and whether a dose dependent effect on clinical outcomes could be demonstrated.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted for all elective colorectal cancer resections performed at a single institution (University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom) within an established enhanced recovery programme, between June 2008 and July 2013.

The study was registered with and approved by the Clinical Governance Support Unit of the University Hospital Birmingham on 11th October 2013 and conducted in accordance with the ethical principles (CAO-05482-13).

Data acquisition

Data was extracted from existing robust electronic patient databases (Prescribing Information and Communication System and Clinical Portal) by the Bio-informatics Department at University Hospital Birmingham to produce a working dataset. All data was independently controlled for accuracy. Data was manually extracted from the electronic patient databases for 10% of patients which were randomly sampled from the working dataset. Any data field from the sample that was less than 100% accurate was then manually extracted from the electronic databases for all patients in the working dataset.

Patients were divided into statin users and non-statin users. Statin users were defined as patients who were prescribed statins at admission and who were prescribed statins within a five day post-operative period. Statin dose was classified as low-dose, moderate-dose or high-dose and defined as; low-dose ≤20 mg simvastatin, moderate-dose=40 mg simvastatin, high-dose >40 mg simvastatin (or equivalent doses of other statins). All statins currently available for use in the United Kingdom were included (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin).

Data extracted from the electronic patient databases is outlined in Table 1.

  Patient Demographics Age
BMI
Gender
Smoking Status
  Patient Co-morbidities Chronic Kidney Disease
Diabetes Mellitus
Heart Failure
Hypertension
Ischaemic Heart Disease
Lung Disease
  Tumour Characteristics Cancer Location
T-stage
N-stage
M-stage
Neo-adjuvant Therapy
  Operative Characteristics Operation Type
Operation Technique
Stoma Formation
  Post-operative Complications Abdominal Collection
Acute Kidney Injury
Anastomotic Dehiscence
Bacteraemia
Cardio-respiratory Event
Intestinal Obstruction
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Re-operations Re-operation (any cause)
  Post-operative Antibiotic Use Co-amoxiclav
Piperacillin-tazobactam
Meropenem
Vancomycin
Length of Stay (LOS) Critical Care LOS
Total LOS
Re-admissions 30-day readmission
  Mortality 30-day mortality
90-day mortality
12-month mortality
24-month mortality
60-month mortality
  Pre- and Post-operative Blood Tests Absolute White Cell Count
Neutrophil Count
Lymphocyte Count
Platelet Count
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio
C-reactive Protein (Post-operative only)

Table 1: Data extracted from the electronic databases.

The following definitions were applied to the extracted data.

  • Post-operative complications ≤30 days after surgery were recorded for all patients and were defined as follows:
    • Abdominal Collection was defined as a radiologically diagnosed collection of the abdominal cavity or pelvis that required intervention or prolonged hospital stay.
    • Acute Kidney Injury was defined as a percentage increase in serum creatinine ≥50% from baseline.
    • Anastomotic Dehiscence was defined as surgically confirmed dehiscence and/or radiologically diagnosed dehiscence (fluid collection in close proximity to an anastomosis that was drained yielding purulent fluid or gas and/or evidence of contrast leak).
    • Bacteraemia was defined as the presence of a positive microbiology culture from a central or peripheral blood sample.
    • Cardio-respiratory Events included a confirmed diagnosis of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism and/or cardiac dysrhythmia (which was not as a consequence of infection) that required appropriate treatment.
    • Intestinal Obstruction was defined as a confirmed radiological diagnosis of mechanical or functional intestinal obstruction which resulted in a prolonged hospital stay.
    • Lower Respiratory Tract Infection was defined as a confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia that required antibiotic therapy.
  • Re-operations were defined as a return to theatre ≤30 days of the index procedure.
  • Re-admissions were defined as a return to hospital ≤30 days of the index procedure requiring a hospital stay ≥24 hours.
  • Critical Care LOS was defined by the number of days on critical care requiring level-2 or level-3 care.
  • Total LOS was defined by the number of days in hospital including the day of surgery.
  • Post-operative Antibiotic Use was defined as a prescription for coamoxiclav, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem or vancomycin ≤30 days after surgery and was used as a surrogate marker for postoperative infective complication.
  • Mortality was recorded and categorised into 30-day, 90-day, 12-month, 24-month and 60-month mortality.

Pre-operative inflammatory markers included pre-operative values closest to the day of surgery and not including the day of surgery. Postoperative inflammatory markers included the minimum, maximum and mean values within a 7 day post-operative period.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons between statin and non-statin groups were calculated using Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 test or Fisher Exact test for continuous and categorical data respectively. Univariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for continuous and categorical data respectively. Multivariate analysis was then performed including all variables from the univariate analyses with a p-value <0.4 with 100% complete data. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier graphs and Tarone-Ware p-values were used as a measure of significance. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox Regression analysis. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS version 17 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).Statistical significance was defined a priori as a p-value <0.05.

Results

A total of 703 patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection within an established enhanced recovery programme, between June 2008 and July 2013 were reviewed. The median age of the population was 69 years (IQR 60-76 years) with 58.3% of male gender. 53.2% of patients underwent a resection involving the rectum and 31.7% of procedures were completed entirely laparoscopically. Only 2.7% of patients required a re-operation. The median length of stay was 9 days (IQR 6-15 days) and 9.0% of patients were readmitted up to 30 days of the index procedure. 30-day, 90-day, 12-month, 24-month and 60-month mortality was 1.1%, 2.3%, 7.7%, 11.7%, and 20.6% respectively with a median follow-up of 51 months (Range 22-82 months, IQR 35-66 months). Data completeness was generally high for patient variables and was 100% for all patient outcomes.

246 (35.0% [246/703]) patients were statin users. The mean number of statin doses omitted during the index admission was 1.36 doses (95% CI=1.04-1.67 doses). The majority of patients were on simvastatin (76.0% [186/246]) and the remainder were on atorvastatin (18.3% [45/246]), pravastatin (2.85% [7/246]), rosuvastatin (2.44% [6/246]) and fluvastatin (0.41% [1/246]). The majority of patients were on moderate-dose statin (64.6% [159/246]) and the remainder were on low-dose (26.0% [64/246]) and high-dose (9.4% [23/246]) statins.

Statin users were significantly older (71 vs. 67, p<0.0001), had a higher BMI (27.5 vs. 26.0, p=0.0005), had a higher incidence of medical comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension and ischaemic heart disease (All p<0.0001). Interestingly, statin users were significantly more likely to have a colonic cancer than a rectal cancer (60.2% vs. 48.1%, p=0.0023) and this is reflected in significantly fewer rectal resections, a reduced requirement for neo-adjuvant therapy and fewer stomas formed.

No statistical differences were identified in post-operative complications, post-operative antibiotic use, re-operations and readmissions. Statin users appeared to have an increased rate of Critical Care admission, Critical Care length of stay and total length of stay. It also appeared that statin users had a greater mortality at 12-months, 24-months and 60-months. The population characteristics and outcomes according to statin use are shown in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.

Variable Statin User (n=246) Non-statin User (n=457) p-value
Age, median (IQR) 71 (65-78) 67 (58-76) <0.0001
Gender, n (%), M/F 146/100 (59.3/40.7) 264/193 (57.8/42.2) 0.6894
BMI, median (IQR), kg/m2 27.5 (24.8-31.7) 26.0 (22.9-29.6) 0.0005
Smoking Status, n (%), 1/2/3a 28/87/112 (11.4/35.4/45.5) 53/147/234 (11.6/32.2/51.2) 0.4882
Chronic Kidney Disease, n (%), y 14 (5.7) 13 (2.8) 0.2000
Diabetes Mellitus, n (%), y 76 (30.9) 35 (7.6) <0.0001
Heart Failure, n (%), y 12 (4.8) 2 (0.4) <0.0001
Hypertension, n (%), y 163 (66.3) 153 (33.5) <0.0001
Ischaemic Heart Disease, n (%) y 71 (28.8) 17 (3.7) <0.0001
Lung Disease, n (%), y 39 (15.9) 67 (14.7) 0.6734
Cancer Location, n (%), 1/2b 148/98 (60.2/39.8) 220/237 (48.1/51.9) 0.0023
T-Stage, n (%), 0/1/2/3/4 18/33/136/56 (7.3/13.4/55.2/22.7) 37/54/229/117 (8.1/ 11.8/50.1/25.6) 0.6544
N-Stage, n (%), 0/1/2 145/60/39 (58.9/24.4/15.9) 252/139/62 (55.1/30.4/13.6) 0.2185
M-Stage, n (%), 0/1 210/35 (85.4/14.2) 377/76 (82.5/16.7) 0.4480
Neo-adjuvant Therapy, n (%), y 38 (15.4) 102 (22.3) 0.0298
Operation Type, n (%), 1/2c 142/104 (57.7/42.3) 224/233 (49.0/51.0) 0.0275
Operation Technique, n (%), 1/2d 163/83 (66.3/33.7) 317/140 (69.4/30.6) 0.3988

Table 2: Population characteristics according to statin use.
y=yes, 1/2/3a =active/former/never
1/2b=colon/recto-sigmoid junction and rectum.
1/2c =segmental/rectal.
1/2d=open and laparoscopic converted to open/laparoscopic.


Outcomes Statin User (n=246) Non-statin User (n=457) p-value
Abdominal Collection, n (%), y 7 (2.9) 18 (3.9) 0.3829
Acute Kidney Injury, n (%), y 7 (2.9) 7 (1.5) 0.5274
Anastomotic Dehiscence, n (%), y 13 (5.3) 15 (3.3) 0.7003
Bacteraemia, n (%), y 3 (1.2) 4 (0.2) 0.3273
Cardio-respiratory Event, n (%), y 11 (4.5) 20 (4.4) 1.0000
Intestinal Obstruction, n (%), y 18 (7.3) 25 (5.4) 0.2631
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, n (%), y 16 (6.5) 22 (4.8) 0.2258
Re-operation, n (%), y 7 (2.9) 12 (2.6) 0.8640
Stoma, n (%), y 52 (21.1) 134 (29.3) 0.0199
Post-operative Antibiotic Use, n(%), y 156 (63.4) 268 (58.6) 0.2175
Critical Care Admission, n (%), y 51 (20.7) 60 (13.1) 0.0094
Critical Care LOS, median (range, IQR), days 0.0 (0.0-72.4, 0.0-0.0) 0.0 (0.0-35.1, 0.0-0.0) 0.0049
Critical Care LOS, mean (95% CI), days 1.57 (0.70-2.45) 0.56 (0.31-0.82) 0.0049
Total LOS, median (range, IQR), days 9.87 (2.0-277.4, 6.8-17.1) 8.94 (1.2-246.1, 6.1-13.5) 0.0160
Total LOS, mean (95% CI), days 16.57 (13.66-19.48) 13.79 (11.95-15.63) 0.0160
Readmission, n (%), y 25 (10.2) 38 (8.3) 0.8414
Mortality, n (%), y      
30-day 5 (2.0) 3 (0.7) 0.1359
90-day 9 (3.6) 7 (1.5) 0.1081
12-month 32 (13.0) 22 (4.8) 0.0002
24-month 46 (18.7) 36 (7.8) <0.0001
60-month 74 (30.0) 71 (15.5) <0.0001

Table 3: Population outcomes according to statin use.
y=yes

There were no statistically significant differences in pre-operative inflammatory markers between statin and non-statin users. In particular there was no difference in pre-operative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Post-operatively, statin users had a higher maximum absolute white cell count (13.1 vs. 12.4, p=0.0418) but a lower minimal platelet count (198.0 vs. 208.5, p=0.0217) and minimal CRP level (32.0 vs. 42.0, p=0.0188).

Univariate analysis

Univariate analysis demonstrated significant increases in the rate of admission to Critical Care (OR=1.91, 95% CI=1.23-2.97, p=0.0040) and in the total length of stay (14% increase in LOS, 95% CI=0.012-0.10, p=0.0130) in statin users. Statin users were significantly less likely to require a stoma after elective colorectal cancer resection (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93, p=0.0190). The results of univariate analysis are displayed in Table 4.

  Outcomes   Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Univariate Logistic Regression      
Abdominal Collection 0.71 0.29-1.73 0.457
Acute Kidney Injury 1.88 0.65- 5.43 0.242
Anastomotic Dehiscence** 1.64 0.77-3.51 0.199
Bacteraemia 1.40 0.31-6.30 0.663
Cardio-respiratory Event 1.02 0.48-2.17 0.953
Intestinal Obstruction** 1.36 0.73-2.55 0.331
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection** 1.38 0.71-2.67 0.346
Re-operation 1.09 0.59-1.98 0.791
Stoma** 0.65 0.45-0.93 0.019
Post-operative Antibiotic Use** 1.17 0.84-1.64 0.347
Critical Care Admission** 1.91 1.23-2.97 0.004
Readmission 1.25 0.73-2.12 0.414
  Outcomes Change in Risk (%) 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Univariate Linear Regression      
Critical Care LOS** 43 0.67-7.31 0.102
Total LOS** 14 0.01-0.10 0.013

Table 4: Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis and Univariate Linear Regression Analysis (indicating ‘Odds Ratio’ and ‘Change in Risk’ for statin use).

Multivariate analysis

The criteria for inclusion into multivariate analysis was p<0.4000, event incidence ≥28 and data completeness of 100% (marked **). After adjustment for age and gender differences, multivariate analysis demonstrated significant increases in rate of admission to Critical Care (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.16-2.87, p=0.0090) and in the total length of stay (12% increase in LOS, 95% CI=0.002-0.10, p=0.0420) in statin users. Statin users were significantly less likely to require a stoma after elective colorectal cancer resection (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95, p=0.0280) than non-statin users. The results of multivariate analysis are displayed in Table 5.

Outcomes Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p-value
Multivariate Logistic Regression      
Anastomotic Dehiscence 1.40 0.65-3.05 0.394
Intestinal Obstruction 1.50 0.78-2.89 0.221
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection 1.24 0.63-2.43 0.536
Stoma 0.65 0.45-0.95 0.028
Post-operative Antibiotic Use 1.36 0.96-1.92 0.087
Critical Care Admission 1.83 1.16-2.87 0.009
Outcomes Change in Risk (%) 95% Confidence Interval p-value
Multivariate Linear Regression      
Critical Care LOS 36 -0.01-0.28 0.065
Total LOS 12 0.002-0.10 0.042

Table 5: Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis and Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis (indicating ‘Odds Ratio’ and ‘Change in Risk’ for statin use)

Survival analysis

Univariate survival analysis revealed an increased mortality rate associated with statin use (Tarone-Ware p-value=0.0450), however, when adjusted for age and gender, multivariate Cox Regression analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality associated with statin use (HR=1.21, 95% CI=0.90-1.62, p=0.2120) over a median follow-up of 51 months (Range 22-82 months, IQR 35-66 months).

Dose dependent effect of Statin therapy

The number of statin users on low-dose, moderate-dose and highdose statins were 64/246 (26.0%), 159/246 (64.6%) and 23/246 (9.4%) respectively. There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics according to statin dose. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the total length of stay (4% increase in LOS, 95% CI=1.00-1.22, p<0.0001) with increasing dose of statin. The results of univariate analysis for increasing dose of statin are displayed in Table 6.

  Outcomes Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Univariate Logistic Regression      
Abdominal Collection** 1.05 0.99-1.12 0.081
Acute Kidney Injury 1.01 0.88-1.16 0.0937
Anastomotic Dehiscence 0.98 0.90-1.06 0.550
Bacteraemia 0.91 0.81-1.02 0.115
Cardio-respiratory Event 0.98 0.91-1.06 0.621
Intestinal Obstruction 0.62 0.91-1.06 0.621
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection 0.99 0.97-1.05 0.760
Re-operation** 0.95 0.89 - 1.00 0.058
Stoma 0.99 0.97-1.02 0.459
Post-operative Antibiotic Use 1.00 0.97-1.02 0.712
Critical Care Admission 1.00 0.96-1.04 0.896
Readmission 1.01 0.97-1.04 0.750
  Outcomes Change in Risk (%) 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Univariate Linear Regression      
Critical Care LOS -10 -0.69-0.85 0.836
Total LOS** 4 1.00-1.22 <0.0001

Table 6: Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis and Univariate Linear Regression Analysis (indicating ‘Odds Ratio’ and ‘Change in Risk’ for increasing dose of statin).

The criteria for inclusion into multivariate analysis was p<0.4000 and data completeness of 100% (marked **). After adjustment for age and gender, multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant differences in rates of abdominal collection, acute kidney injury, re-operation or total length of hospital stay with increasing dose of statin. The results of multivariate analysis are displayed in Table 7.

  Outcomes Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Multivariate Logistic Regression      
Abdominal Collection 0.97 0.94-1.06 0.096
Acute Kidney Injury 0.96 0.90-1.03 0.250
Re-operation 0.95 0.90-1.06 0.550
  Outcomes Change in Risk (%) 95% Confidence Interval   p-value
Multivariate Linear Regression      
Total LOS 3 -0.004-0.001 0.270

Table 7: Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis and Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis (indicating ‘Odds Ratio’ and ‘Change in Risk’ for increasing dose of statin).

Univariate survival analysis revealed a reduction in mortality associated with high-dose statin (Tarone-Ware p-value=0.0490). When adjusted for age and gender, multivariate Cox Regression analysis revealed no significant reduction in mortality when comparing high-dose and lowdose statin therapy (HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.41-1.09, p=0.1100)over a median follow-up of 51 months (Range 22-82 months, IQR 35-66 months).

Discussion

35.0% of patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection were on statins. The published literature documents the incidence of statin use in a general surgical population ranges from 10.5–32.0% [38,41,42]. The largest colorectal cancer patient cohort, form Denmark, revealed 18.8% (518/2755) of patients received statins in the peri-operative period [38]. This discrepancy may reflect differences in prescribing policy between different nations and/or true differences in levels of health in the patient populations as statins are principally used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a variety of populations [1-6]. The mean percentage of statin doses omitted during the index admission was 8.5%,which equates to one missed dose per statin user, indicating that patients resumed statin therapy as they resumed enteral nutrition and their regular medications.

In terms of population characteristics, statin users were significantly different from non-statin users. Those patients on statins were significantly older, had a higher BMI and were a more co-morbid population (diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension and ischaemic heart disease). Despite these differences, statin users had equivalent outcomes in frequency of post-operative complications (abdominal collection, acute kidney injury, anastomotic dehiscence, bacteraemia, cardio-respiratory event, lower respiratory tract infection), postoperative antibiotic use (used as a surrogate to indicate post-operative infective complication), re-operations and re-admissions and there was no statistically significant difference in mortality after appropriate age and gender adjustments with a median follow-up of 51 months (Range 22-82 months, IQR 35-66 months).

It is known that patients with pre-existing co-morbidities are at an increased peri-operative risk of developing complications as the surgical insult increases the demand on organs with already compromised function [51]. It has also been demonstrated that elevated BMI, in conjunction with advanced age, is predictive of morbidity and mortality following general surgery [52]. Despite a greater base-line peri-operative risk, evidenced by an older more co-morbid population, statin users had analogous outcomes and complication profiles to non-statin users.

Univariate analysis, however, demonstrated significant increases in the rate of admission to Critical Care and in the total length of stay in statin users compared to non-statin-users and these findings remained statistically significant, after adjustment for age and gender differences, in multivariate analysis. Statin users were 1.83 times more likely to need Critical Care support and had a hospital length of stay 12% longer than non-statin users. This is not only a reflection of an increased co-morbidity but a sign of a prolonged functional recovery and it may also represent an additional patient need for assistance with physiotherapy, occupational therapy and stoma therapy in this specific patient group.

There were no differences in pre-operative markers of inflammation between statin and non-statin users. Post-operatively, statin users had a higher maximum absolute white cell count, but conversely, a lower minimum platelet count and CRP levels than non-statin users. It is known that IL-6 is the primary mediator of inflammation following surgery and is responsible for the production of CRP. IL-6 has been demonstrated to predict post-operative complications [53] and it has been shown that IL-6 is suppressed by statin therapy [54,55]. This would therefore explain the significant reduction in post-operative minimum CRP observed in statin users.

This is the first study to attempt to determine if a dose dependent effect of statin therapy on patient outcomes following elective colorectal cancer resection exists. There were no observed differences in postoperative complications, post-operative antibiotic use, re-operations, admission to Critical Care, Critical Care length of stay, total length of stay and re-admissions with increasing dose of statin. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the total length of stay with increasing dose of statin but this finding did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for age and gender in multivariate analysis. Regarding survival, univariate survival analysis revealed a reduction in mortality associated with high-dose statin, but when adjusted for age and gender, multivariate Cox Regression analysis revealed no significant dose dependent difference in mortality (HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.41-1.09, p=0.1100).

There were no observed differences in operative technique or tumour stage between statin and non-statin users. Interestingly, statin users were significantly more likely to have a colonic cancer than a rectal cancer and consequently significantly fewer rectal resections, a reduced requirement for neo-adjuvant therapy and fewer stomas formed. In multivariate analysis statin users were significantly less likely to require a stoma after elective colorectal cancer resection than non-statin users. It is known that of the 10,000 or so patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer each year in the United Kingdom (Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, Hartmann’s Resection) over 80% undergo stoma formation of which the majority are temporary ileostomies used to ‘cover’ the colorectal anastomosis of an Anterior Resection [56] and so this finding, in the context of fewer rectal cancer incidences, is not surprising.

The finding of relatively fewer rectal cancers compared to colon cancers has been reported in the published literature in cohorts from the USA and the Netherlands which describe a risk reduction for rectal cancer of 30-40% [57-59] in statin users. This finding has not been described in a patient cohort from the United Kingdom to date. It has been proposed that statins may affect cancer genotype [60] and they have been associated with a reduced incidence of KRAS-wild-type mutations which have a tendency to affect the rectum [61], perhaps by their role in prenylation of KRAS [62]. Statins have also been found to inhibit the production of cyclogenoxygenase-2 [63] which is also commonly found to be overexpressed in rectal cancer [64]. These molecular differences may, in part, explain the observed increased incidence of colonic versus rectal cancers in statin users.

This retrospective analysis has several limitations. As with any retrospective analysis, the study is limited by the patient groups not being matched at baseline and consequently this can introduce confounding with the potential for unmeasured factors influencing the observed results. Examples include the use of aspirin and metformin which, conceivably, would have been used more frequently in statin users and have been associated with reduced cancer related mortality [13,65-67]. Although peri-operative care was provided within the setting of an established enhanced recovery programme, which utilises a standardised surgical protocol, confounders in patient management cannot be excluded.

The definition of statin user was dependent upon the prescription of statins at admission and who were prescribed statins within a five day post-operative period. There was an assumption that patients prescribed statins at admission were taking statins regularly pre-operatively prior to their admission and were therefore within the window of potential pleiotropy.

The strengths of this study include prospective data collection, high data completeness (associated with the use of robust electronic patient databases [Prescribing Information and Communication System and Clinical Portal] and vigorous data validation) and the use of multivariate analysis in an attempt to minimise confounding.

Conclusions

This study has explored the impact of peri-operative statin therapy on post-operative outcomes after elective colorectal cancer resection. Despite statin users having a higher peri-operative risk (significant increases in age, BMI and co-morbidity), they had equivalent outcomes in frequency of post-operative complications, post-operative antibiotic use, re-operations, re-admissions and there was no statistically significant difference in mortality after appropriate age and gender adjustments. Statin users were, however, more likely to need Critical Care support and had an increased hospital length of stay than non-statin users. This may reflect a higher peri-operative risk but also an additional need for assistance with physiotherapy, occupational therapy and stoma therapy in this specific patient group. No statistically significant dose related differences were identified in patient outcomes although an overall risk reduction in mortality with increasing dose of statin remains possible. Statin users achieved equivalent short-term and long-term outcomes to non-statin users despite an increased operative risk and their use in the peri-operative period, particularly at high doses, merits further investigation.


References

  1. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (1994) Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Lancet 344: 1383-1389. [Ref.]
  2. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, et al. (1995) Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 333: 1301-1307. [Ref.]
  3. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, et al. (1996) The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med 335: 1001-1009. [Ref.]
  4. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, et al. (1998) Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/ TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA 279: 1615-1622. [Ref.]
  5. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group (1998) Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 339: 1349-1357. [Ref.]
  6. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, et al. (2008) Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 359: 2195-2207. [Ref.]
  7. Lange BM, Rujan T, Martin W, Croteau R (2000) Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13172-13177. [Ref.]
  8. Liao JK (2002) Isoprenoids as mediators of the biological effects of statins. J Clin Invest 110: 285-288. [Ref.]
  9. Laufs U, Endres M, Custodis F, Gertz K, Nickenig G, et al. (2000) Suppression of endothelial nitric oxide production after withdrawal of statin treatment is mediated by negative feedback regulation of rho GTPase gene transcription. Circulation 102: 3104-3110. [Ref.]
  10. Laufs U, Liao JK (1998) Post-transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA stability by Rho GTPase. J Biol Chem 273: 24266-24271. [Ref.]
  11. Yoshida M, Sawada T, Ishii H, Gerszten RE, Rosenzweig A, et al. (2001) Hmg-CoA reductase inhibitor modulates monocyte-endothelial cell interaction under physiological flow conditions in vitro: involvement of Rho GTPase-dependent mechanism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 1165-1171. [Ref.]
  12. Terkeltaub R, Solan J, Barry M, Jr, Santoro D, Bokoch GM (1994) Role of the mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid synthesis in IL-8 generation by activated monocytic cells. J Leukoc Biol 55: 749-755. [Ref.]
  13. Diomede L, Albani D, Sottocorno M, Donati MB, Bianchi M, et al. (2001) In vivo anti-inflammatory effect of statins is mediated by nonsterol mevalonate products. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 1327-1332. [Ref.]
  14. Inoue I, Goto S, Mizotani K, Awata T, Mastunaga T, et al. (2000) Lipophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor has an anti-inflammatory effect: reduction of MRNA levels for interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, cyclooxygenase-2, and p22phox by regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) in primary endothelial cells. Life sci 67: 863-876. [Ref.]
  15. Albert MA, Danielson E, Rifai N, Ridker PM; PRINCE Investigators (2001) Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study. JAMA 286: 64-70. [Ref.]
  16. Musial J, Undas A, Gajewski P, Jankowski M, Sydor W, et al. (2001) Anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. Int J Cardiol 77: 247-253. [Ref.]
  17. Novack V, Eisinger M, Frenkel A, Terblanche M, Adhikari NK, et al. (2009) The effects of statin therapy on inflammatory cytokines in patients with bacterial infections: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 35: 1255-1260. [Ref.]
  18. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Lowenthal SP (2001) Rapid reduction in C-reactive protein with cerivastatin among 785 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 103: 1191-1193. [Ref.]
  19. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M, Downs JR, Weis SE, et al. (2001) Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N Engl J Med 344: 1959-1965. [Ref.]
  20. Ordulu E, Erdogan O (2008) Early effects of low versus high dose atorvastatin treatment on coagulation and inflammation parameters in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol 128: 282-284. [Ref.]
  21. Subramanian S, Emami H, Vucic E, Singh P, Vijayakumar J, et al. (2013) High-Dose Atorvastatin Reduces Periodontal Inflammation: A Novel Pleiotropic Effect of Statins. J Am Coll Cardiol 62: 2382-2391. [Ref.]
  22. Demierre MF, Higgins PD, Gruber SB, Hawk E, Lippman SM (2005) Statins and cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 930-942. [Ref.]
  23. Chan KK, OzaAM, Siu LL (2003) The statins as anticancer agents. Clin Cancer Res 9: 10-19. [Ref.]
  24. Bansal D, Undela K, D’Cruz S, Schifano F (2012) Statin use and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 7: e46691. [Ref.]
  25. Singh S, Singh PP, Singh AG, Murad MH, Sanchez W (2013) Statins Are Associated With a Reduced Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 144: 323-332. [Ref.]
  26. Singh PP, Singh S (2013) Statins are associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 24: 1721-1730. [Ref.]
  27. Singh S, Singh AG, Singh PP, Murad MH, Iyer PG (2013) Statins Are Associated With Reduced Risk of Esophageal Cancer, Particularly in Patients With Barrett’s Esophagus: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 620-629. [Ref.]
  28. Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE (2012) Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N Engl J Med 367: 1792–1802. [Ref.]
  29. Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PD, Almog R, Bonner JD, et al. (2005) Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352: 2184–2192. [Ref.]
  30. Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J (2011) Exposure to statins and risk of common cancers: a series of nested case-control studies. BMC Cancer 11: 409. [Ref.]
  31. Lytras T, Nikolopoulos G, Bonovas S (2014) Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 studies. World J Gastroenterol 20: 1858-1870. [Ref.]
  32. Chan AW, Bhatt DL, Chew DP, Quinn MJ, Moliterno DJ, et al. (2002) Early and Sustained Survival Benefit Associated With Statin Therapy at the Time of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 105: 691-696. [Ref.]
  33. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, Gutierrez B, Benjamin EM. (2004) et al. Lipid-lowering therapy and in-hospital mortality following major noncardiac surgery. Jama 291: 2092-2099. [Ref.]
  34. Ward RP, Leeper NJ, Kirkpatrick JN, Lang RM, Sorrentino MJ, (2005) et al. The effect of preoperative statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing infrainguinal vascular surgery. Int J Cardiol 104: 264-268. [Ref.]
  35. Tleyjeh IM, Kashour T, Hakim FA, Zimmerman VA, Erwin PJ, et al. (2009) Statins for the prevention and treatment of infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine 169: 1658-1667. [Ref.]
  36. Kayani WT, Bandeali SJ, Lee VV, Elayda M, Khan A, et al. (2013) Association between statins and infections after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Cardiol 168: 117-120. [Ref.]
  37. Radaelli A, Loardi C, Cazzaniga M, Balestri G, DeCarlini C, Cerrito MG, et al. (2007) Inflammatory activation during coronary artery surgery and its dose-dependent modulation by statin/ACE-inhibitor combination. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 27: 2750-2755. [Ref.]
  38. Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Kelly KN, Rusheen AE, Dolan JG, et al. (2014) Perioperative pleiotropic statin effects in general surgery. Surgery. 155: 398-407. [Ref.]
  39. Singh PP, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Maccormick AD, Hill AG (2012) Statins in abdominal surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214: 356-366. [Ref.]
  40. Khan A, Yeung D, Wyatt B, Rafai T, Byant J,Coates A, et al. (2009) Effects of statins on postoperative sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and mortality after colorectal surgery. Critical Care 13: 47. [Ref.]
  41. Singh PP, Srinivasa S, Bambarawana S, Lemanu DP, Kahokehr AA, et al. (2012) Perioperative Use of Statins in Elective Colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 55: 205-210. [Ref.]
  42. Bisgard A, Noack M, Klein M, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I (2013) Perioperative Statin Therapy Is Not Associated With Reduced Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 56: 980-986. [Ref.]
  43. Schussler O, Alifano M, Dermine H, Strano S, Casetta A, et al. (2006) Postoperative pneumonia after major lung resection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173: 1161-1169. [Ref.]
  44. Auguste P, Fallavollita L, Wang N, Burnier J, Bikfalvi A, et al. (2007) The host inflammatory response promotes liver metastasis by increasing tumor cell arrest and extravasation. Am J Pathol 170: 1781-1792. [Ref.]
  45. Lin JK, Yueh TC, Chang SC, Lin CC, Lan YT, et al. (2011) The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15: 2251-2261. [Ref.]
  46. Ohtsuka T, Kitajima Y, Takahashi T, Sato S, Miyoshi A, et al. (2009) Infectious complications after gastric cancer surgery accelerate a rapid hepatic recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology 56: 1277-1280. [Ref.]
  47. Matsuo K, Prather CP, Ahn EH, Eno ML, Tierney KE, et al. (2012) Significance of perioperative infection in survival of patients with ovarian cancer.Int J Gynecol Cancer 22: 245-253. [Ref.]
  48. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A (2009) Cancerrelated inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 30: 1073-1081. [Ref.]
  49. Farid SG, Aldouri A, Morris-Stiff G, Khan AZ, Toogood GJ, et al. (2010) Correlation between postoperative infective complications and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg 251: 91–100. [Ref.]
  50. Andalib A, Ramana-Kumar AV, Bartlett G, Franco EL, Ferri LE (2013) Influence of postoperative infectious complications on long-term survival of lung cancer patients: a population-based cohort study. J ThoracOncol 8: 554–561. [Ref.]
  51. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248: 189-198. [Ref.]
  52. Yanquez FJ, Clements JM, Grauf D, Merchant AM (2013) Synergistic effect of age and body mass index on mortality and morbidity in general surgery. Journal of Surgical Research 184: 89-100. [Ref.]
  53. Ugras B, Giris M, Erbil Y, Gökpınar M, Çıtlak G, et al. (2008) Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by measuring peritoneal cytokines: Prospective study. International Journal of Surgery 6: 28-35. [Ref.]
  54. Arnaud C, Burger F, Steffens S, Veillard NR, Nguyen TH, et al. (2005) Statins Reduce Interleukin-6–Induced C-Reactive Protein in Human Hepatocytes: New Evidence for Direct Antiinflammatory Effects of Statins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 1231-1236. [Ref.]
  55. Panichi V, Paoletti S, Mantuano E, Manca-Rizza G, Filippi C, et al. (2006) In vivo and in vitro effects of simvastatin on inflammatory markers in pre-dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 337-344. [Ref.]
  56. National Bowel Cancer Audit Report (2015). [Ref.]
  57. Coogan PF, Smith J, Rosenberg L (2007) Statin Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 99: 32-40. [Ref.]
  58. Graaf MR, Beiderbeck AB, Egberts ACG, Richel DJ, Guchelaar H-J (2004) The Risk of Cancer in Users of Statins. J Clin Oncol 22: 2388- 2394. [Ref.]
  59. Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PDR, Almog R, Bonner JD, et al. (2005) Statins and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med 352: 2184-2192. [Ref.]
  60. Lee JE, Baba Y, Ng K, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, et al. (2011) Statin Use and Colorectal Cancer Risk According to Molecular Subtypes in Two Large Prospective Cohort Studies. Cancer Prev Res 4: 1808-1815. [Ref.]
  61. Frattini M, Balestra D, Suardi S, Oggionni M, Alberici P, et al. (2004) Different Genetic Features Associated with Colon and Rectal Carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 10: 4015-4021. [Ref.]
  62. Krens LL, Baas JM, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar H-J (2010) Therapeutic modulation of k-ras signaling in colorectal cancer. Drug Discov Today 15: 502-516. [Ref.]
  63. Habib A, Shamseddeen I, Nasrallah MS, Antoun TA, Nemer G, et al. (2007) Modulation of COX-2 expression by statins in human monocytic cells. FASEB J 21: 1665-1674. [Ref.]
  64. Dimberg J, Samuelsson A, Hugander A, Söderkvist P (1999) Differential expression of cyclooxygenase 2 in human colorectal cancer. Gut 45: 730-732. [Ref.]
  65. Danesh FR, Anel RL, Zeng L, Lomasney J, Sahai A, et al. (2003) Immunomodulatory effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Arch ImmunolTherExp(Warsz) 51: 139-148. [Ref.]
  66. Davignon J (2004) Beneficial cardiovascular pleiotropic effects of statins. Circulation 109: III39-III43. [Ref.]
  67. Liao JK, Laufs U (2005) Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45: 89-118. [Ref.]

Download Provisional PDF Here


Article Information

Article Type: Research Article

Citation: Richardson JJR, Roberts-Rhodes C, Suggett NR, Gao-Smith F, Thickett DR (2017) Is HMG-Co A Reductase Inhibitor Use Associated with Improved Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Resection? J Surg Open Access 3(3): doi http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2470-0991.150

Copyright: © 2017 Richardson JJR, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Publication history: 

  • Received date: 08 Mar 2017

  • Accepted date: 28 Mar 2017

  • Published date: 03 Apr 2017