Water and Wastewater Treatment - Sci Forschen

Full Text

Research Article
Utilization of Organic Acid Solution Prepared for High-Strength Ammonium Treatment Using Alcaligenes faecalis No.4

  Makoto Shoda*       Yoichi Ishikawa   

Able Corporation, 7-9 Nishigoken-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 216-0812 Japan

*Corresponding author: Makoto Shoda, Able Corporation, 7-9 Nishigoken-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 216-0812 Japan, Tel: +81-3-260- 0485; Fax: +81-3-260-0485; E-mail: mshoda@res.titech.ac.jp


Abstract

For efficient treatment of ammonium utilizing Alcaligenes faecalis No.4 (No.4) which is capable of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification, organic acid solution as a main carbon source for No.4 was prepared by anaerobic degradation of organic matter and sugar. The prepared solution contained total organic carbon (TOC) of 20,049 mg/L and this value was similar to the value of the carbon content of eight organic acids 20,754 mg-C/L, and thus TOC was used as an index to determine the optimal carbon amount to be added to the wastewater. The solution was used to two high-strength ammonium wastewaters, leachate and anaerobic digestion wastewaters, to supplement the carbon, which were deficient in carbon relative to the high ammonium concentration. Complete removal of ammonium of 600-700 mg-NH4 -N/L in the two wastewaters was attained by No.4 based on the ratio of carbon of TOC/ammonium -N 10. During the treatment, the changes in carbon content of eight organic acids were well-correlated with the changes in TOC. The ammonium removal rates of these experiments were approximately 100 times higher than that of conventional ammonium treatment system.

Keywords

Heterotrophic nitrification; Aerobic denitrification; Alcaligenes faecalis; Organic acid solution

Introduction

Many bacteria are known to be capable of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification [1-9]. The use of these bacteria is more advantageous than the conventional nitrogen removal process of an aerobic nitrification and an anaerobic denitrification because ammonium removal is achieved in one reactor using one type of bacteria under aerobic condition. The ammonium removal rates are higher than those in the conventional ammonium removal process and the short hydraulic retention time is possible. However, the experiments using these bacteria were conducted under low-strength ammonium conditions.

In a previous study [10], we showed that Alcaligenes faecalis No.4 (No.4) has the ability to carry out the following heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification, NH4 +→ NH2OH → N2 O → N2 . Approximately 40% of ammonium was converted into N2 gas and 60% in cell mass. Only a small percentage of NO2 - and NO3 - was produced from ammonium. No.4 removed more than 90% of high-strength ammonium and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from crude piggery wastewater without dilution of the wastewater [11]. No.4 also exhibited an ammonium removal rate of 3 kg-NH4 -N/m3/day in the treatment of anaerobically digested sludge from a municipal wastewater plant [12]. Wastewater from a chemical company that contained a high concentration of ammonium (5,000 mg-NH4 -N/L) and a small amount of BOD was treated using No.4 and the average ammonium removal rate was 1.1 kg-NH4 -N/m3 /day [13]. These removal rates were several hundred-fold higher than that in the conventional treatment method.

As No.4 utilizes primarily organic acids as a carbon source and no sugar is available, a chemical agent of citrate was used as a carbon source in those previous experiments. In the previous paper [10], we demonstrated the optimal ratio of organic carbon to ammonium-nitrogen for No.4 was 10, indicating that at this ratio, nitrogen and carbon sources were simultaneously consumed. In practical treatment, inexpensive production and supply of organic acids is a key for the materialization of No.4 in ammonium treatment. In this study, we conducted anaerobic fermentation using leachate as seed supplemented with sugar to obtain high organic acid solution. Then, prepared mixture of organic acid solution was supplemented with two high-ammonium and low-carbon wastewaters by balancing C/N ratio around to 10 and the effectiveness of the prepared solution was confirmed.

Materials and Methods
Strain

The detailed characteristics of No.4 are described in a previous paper [10]. Cultured cells of No.4 were mixed with a 50% glycerol solution in vials and stored at -84℃. For each pre-culture, one vial was used as the No.4 inoculum.

Synthetic medium

A synthetic medium used was described in detail in the previous papers where citrate was used as a carbon source [12,13]. However, in this study, 12.5 g of sodium lactate was used as a carbon source because the lactate concentration in the prepared organic acid solution was the highest among eight organic acids and the degree of consumption was higher than other organic acids.

Wastewater

The leachate wastewater from a landfill area in B city where the city garbage was land filled was used for ammonium treatment. The total organic carbon (TOC) and ammonium concentration were 4,310 mg/L and 880 mg NH4-N/L, respectively. The anaerobically digested sludge from a municipal waste treatment plant in Y city which contained approximately 900 mg NH4-N/L and almost no TOC was also used for ammonium treatment. The low TOC was primarily because most of the organic acids produced in the anaerobic digester were converted to methane during digestion.

Preparation of the organic acid solution

Forty milliliter leachate wastewater, and 20 g of glucose were mixed in a 1-liter plastic container and statically incubated at 30℃ for two weeks. The TOC and concentrations of eight organic acids in the prepared solution were determined at KURITASU Analyzing Co., Ltd., (Tukuba, Japan).

Reactor

A small-scale jar fermenter (total volume of 1 liter, working volume of 300 mL; BMJ-01PI, Able Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used. The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and pH values were monitored using a DO sensor (SDOC-12F, Able Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and a pH sensor (Easyferm Plus 225, Hamilton Bonaduz AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland) inserted into the fermenter. The temperature was maintained at 30℃. The agitation speed was fixed at 600 rpm and air was supplied at a constant rate of 30 mL/min.

Experimental procedure in the jar fermenter

The No.4 cells were pre-cultivated in 100 mL of the synthetic medium in a 500-mL shaking flask at 30℃ with a shaking speed of 100 strokes per min (spm) for two days, and the culture was used as an inoculum.

The following four experiments were conducted using a jar fermenter:

Experiment 1: Ammonium treatment in the synthetic medium using No.4 and organic acid solution

To verify the use of organic acid solution, 125 mL of the synthetic medium devoid of lactate, 30 mL of No.4 culture and 145 mL of organic acid solution were mixed and the ammonium treatment was conducted. The initial NH4-N concentration was set at 1,200 mg/L using (NH4)2SO4. The volume of organic acid solution was determined so as to be C/N ratio 10

Experiment 2: Ammonium treatment of leachate wastewater only is using No.4 culture

265 mL of leachate wastewater and 35 mL of No.4 culture were mixed and the ammonium treatment was conducted.

Experiment 3: Ammonium treatment of the leachate wastewater using No.4 culture and organic acid solution

230 mL of leachate wastewater, 30 mL of No.4 culture and 40 mL of organic acid solution were mixed and the ammonium treatment was conducted.

Experiment 4: Ammonium treatment of anaerobically digested sludge using No.4 culture and organic acid solution

For a sample containing high NH4 -N concentration and the least amount of carbon, anaerobically digested sludge wastewater was used. 180 mL of the wastewater, 30 mL of No.4 culture and 90 mL of organic acid solution were mixed and the ammonium treatment was carried out. This volume of organic acid solution was also determined that C/N ratio was 10.

Analytical method

The ammonium concentration was determined using an ammonium sensor (SNH-10, Able Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The nitrite and nitrate concentrations were intermittently determined by the method described in the previous paper [13]. The ammonium exhausted from the reactor by aeration was trapped in the 0.1 N H2SO4 solutions and the accumulated ammonium was determined. To determine the number of No.4 cells, the sampled culture was diluted and plated on synthetic agar plates containing the synthetic medium and 1.5% agar, and the plates were then incubated at 30°C for two days. Because it was previously confirmed that No.4 grew on plates significantly faster than other cells indigenous to the leachate sample or anaerobically digested sludge and that No.4 exhibited characteristic morphological features, the colonies that appeared on the plates after two days were counted as No.4 cells, and the cell concentration was expressed as cells/mL. The initial and final values of TOC and the concentrations of eight organic acids in the initial and final samples were determined at KURITASU Analyzing Co., Ltd., (Tukuba, Japan).

Results and Discussion
Prepared highly concentrated organic acid solution

After a 2 week anaerobic incubation of the leachate wastewater, the resulting solution contained 20,049 mg/L of TOC and 52,103 mg/L of total organic acid content of eight types, oxalate, citrate, lactate, formate, acetate, propionate, iso-butyrate and n-butyrate. The estimated carbon content from the organic acid data was 20,754 mg/L, as shown in Table 1. As the carbon contents in the TOC and organic acid solution were almost similar, TOC was used as an indicator to adjust to the necessary carbon content required to treat ammonium completely by balancing C/N ratio 10.The content of NH4-N in the prepared organic acid solution was detected to be 600 mg/L and thus the NH4-N added to the treatment sample was considered to determine the volume of organic acid solution.

 

Content(mg/L)

Carbon content(mg/L)

Oxalate

250

64

Citrate

250

94

Lactate

41202

16481

Formate

479

125

Acetate

4750

1900

Propionate

2402

613

iso-Butyrate

250

102

n-Butyrate

2520

1375

Total

52103

20754

Table 1: Organic acid distribution and carbon content in the prepared organic acid solution.

Ammonium treatment in the synthetic medium using No.4 and organic acid solution

The result is shown in Figure 1. As 1,200 mg-NH4- N/L was the initial concentration, for the complete consumption of ammonium, the carbon content should be 10 times the NH4- N. Therefore, 145 mL of organic acid solution was added to the synthetic medium and the initial TOC was 11,300 mg/L. The ammonium was completely treated and the abrupt increase in DO reflected the exhaustion of ammonium and stop of cell synthesis. The final NH4- N was 0 and the final TOC was 300 mg/L, indicating that 97% of TOC was utilized. The changes in carbon content of the 8 organic acids at initial and final samples were shown in Table 2. The initial and final carbon contents were 10,460 mg-C/L and 387 mgC/L, respectively. These values were almost similar to those measured as TOC. During the treatment, almost no nitrite or nitrate was detected and the evaporated ammonium from the fermenter was less than 0.5% of the initial ammonium concentration. The initial cell number, 7 × 108 cells/mL increased to 4 × 1010 cells /mL at the final stage of the treatment.

 

Initial carbon content(mg/L)

Final carbon content(mg/L)

Oxalate

64

13.3

Citrate

94

9.4

Lactate

8400

296

Formate

65

6.5

Acetate

880

10

Propionate

255

28

iso-Butyrate

102

10.2

n-Butyrate

600

13.6

Total

10460

387

Table 2: Change in the initial and final carbon contents of organic acids in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Ammonium removal when the synthetic medium and organic acid solution were mixed. Symbols: NH4 -N(●), dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) (□), and pH(△).

Ammonium treatment of leachate wastewater using No.4 culture only

The leachate sample, which contained 4,310 mg/L TOC and NH4- N 880 mg/L, was mixed with No.4 culture and the ammonium treatment was conducted. From TOC and NH4- N data, incomplete treatment of ammonia was expected. The result is shown in Figure 2. The initial NH4- N concentration of 780 mg/L decreased to approximately 240 mg/L of NH4- N, which remained untreated due to lack of organic acids in the leachate wastewater.

Figure 2: Ammonium removal when leachate wastewater was treated with No.4 culture: Symbols: NH4 -N(●), dissolved oxygen concentration(DO) (□), and pH(△).

Ammonium treatment of the leachate wastewater using No.4 culture and organic acid solution

As shown in Figure 2, approximately 240 mg/L NH4- N remained untreated. For complete ammonium treatment, 40 mL of organic acid solution was added to the mixture and the ammonium treatment was conducted. The result is shown in Figure 3. The initial TOC was 7,017 mg/L and the initial NH4- N concentration was 659 mg/L. The initial value of 8 kinds of organic acids was 17,750 mg/L in which the estimated carbon content was 6,500 mg/L (Table 3). The final value of TOC was 900 mg/L and the final carbon value of 8 kinds of organic acids was 827 mg/L as shown in Table 3. Complete ammonium removal was observed and thus the effectiveness of the use of organic acid solution and the use of TOC as an index to determine C/N ratio was confirmed.

 

Initial carbon content (mg/L)

Final carbon content (mg/L)

Oxalate

64

64

Citrate

94

94

Lactate

3600

100

Formate

65

65

Acetate

1680

100

Propionate

842

156

iso-Butyrate

102

102

n-Butyrate

136

136

Total

6500

817

Table 3: Change in the initial and final carbon contents of organic acids in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Ammonium removal when leachate wastewater was treated with No.4 culture and organic acid solution. Symbols: NH4-N(●), dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) (□), and pH(△).

Ammonium treatment of anaerobically digested sludge using No.4 culture and organic acid solution

In the previous paper [12] the high-strength ammonium from anaerobically digested sludge, the product of an anaerobic reactor in which methane was produced from excess municipal sewage sludge in Y city, was removed using No.4 with addition of citrate. In this study, a similar sample that contained 900 mg NH4- N/L and 20 mg/L of organic acids was obtained from Y city plant. The low organic acid content indicated that the available carbon for No.4 is scarce, and supplementation of the organic acid solution is essential for complete removal of ammonium. For the initial 180 mL sludge sample, 90 mL of organic acid solution and 30 mL of No.4 culture were mixed and the ammonium removal was monitored, as shown in Figure 4. The initial NH4- N concentration 635 mg/L was completely removed. The initial TOC and total carbon of organic acid content were 7,030 mg/L and 7,314 mg/L (Table 4), respectively and the final carbon content of organic acid content was 348 mg/L as shown in Table 4. In this case, consumed TOC/consumed NH4- N was approximately 9.5. The initial cell number, 3.8 × 108 cells/mL increased to 1.4 × 1010 cells /mL at the final stage of the treatment. In the previous study [12] where citrate was a carbon source, the ammonium removal rate was 3 kg-NH4-N/m3/ day, but in this study the removal rate decreased to 0.8 mainly because lactate was a main carbon source. This indicates that quality of organic acids gives influence on the activity of No.4.

 

Initial carbon content (mg/L)

Final carbon content (mg/L)

Oxalate

6.4

6.4

Citrate

9.4

9.4

Lactate

6000

100

Formate

22

6.5

Acetate

720

138

Propionate

181

64

iso-Butyrate

10.2

10.2

n-Butyrate

365

13.6

Total

7314

348

Table 4: Change in the initial and final carbon contents of organic acids in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Ammonium removal when anaerobically digested sludge was treated with No.4 culture and organic acid solution. Symbols: NH4 -N(●), dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) (□), and pH(△).

The ammonium removal rates in 4 experiments are shown in Table 5. The rates varied depending on the kinds of wastewaters. However, these rates were approximately 100-fold higher than those in conventional ammonium treatment system [14,15]. As a source of organic acids to No.4 which is essential for the utilization of No.4 in ammonium removal, unused organic acids can be obtained from different areas such as citrus fruits and the dairy industry. Mixed organic acid production also can be easily conducted in anaerobic fermentation when excess organic matter is available. As an index of evaluation of treat ability of the mixture of organic acids, TOC is simple and useful because most organic acids are available for No.4.

 

Exp.1

Exp.2

Exp.3

Exp.4

Ammonium removal rate (kg-N/m3/day)

1.2

0.6

1.1

0.8

Table 5: Ammonium removal rates in four experiments

As we showed in previous papers [12,13], No.4 is useful for ammonium removal under high saline condition [10,11] and the cells of No.4 have ability to suppress the plant pathogens [16] and to reduce methane production from rumen [17]. This suggests that the reutilization of the excess cells of No.4 after treatment is possible and this reduces the problem of handling of the excess sludge produced after wastewater treatment.

Conclusions

As Alcaligenes faecalis No.4 primarily utilizes organic acids as a carbon source, a mixture of highly concentrated organic acid solution was prepared using anaerobic fermentation for practical supplementation of carbon to treat high-strength ammonium by No.4. As TOC and carbon content of eight organic acids produced in the prepared mixture were almost similar and the change in TOC and the change in carbon content of eight organic acids were well-correlated, the volume of organic acid solution which should be added to wastewaters was able to determine by using C/N ratio. By the C/N ratio adjustment, No.4 effectively removed 600-700 mg NH4-N/L from the two wastewaters within 24 h.

By the treatment of the two different wastewaters which exhibited high ammonium concentration, the adjustment of the supply volume of organic acid solution resulted in complete ammonium removal and significant decrease in TOC. As the ammonium removal rates were significantly higher than those in conventional nitrogen removal systems, a compact reactor system will be possible to treat high-strength ammonium, in which ammonium can be converted to N2 gas and the cell mass of No.4 via heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification.

References

  1. Lei Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Xi C, Song L (2016) A novel heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying bacterium, Zobellella taiwanens is DN-7, can remove high-strength ammonium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100: 4219-4229. [Ref.]
  2. Zhao B, He YL, Hughes J, Zhang XF (2010) Heterotrophic nitrogen removal by a newly isolated Acinetobacter valcoaceticus HNR. Bioresour Technol 101: 5194-5200. [Ref.]
  3. Padhi SK, Tripathy S, Sen R, Mahapatra AS, Mohanty S, et al. (2013) Characterisation of heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying Klebsiella pneumonia CF-S9 strain for bioremediation of wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 78: 67-73. [Ref.]
  4. Yao S, Ni JR, Ma T, Li C (2013) Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification at low temperature by a newly isolated bacterium, Acinetobacter sp. HA2. Bioresour Technol 139: 80-86. [Ref.]
  5. Chen PZ, Li J, Li QX, Wang YC, Li SP, et al. (2012) Simultaneous heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification by bacterium Rhodococus sp. CPZ24. Bioresour Technol 116: 266-270. [Ref.]
  6. Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2007) Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by diverse Diaphorobacter sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77: 403-409. [Ref.]
  7. Yang XP, Wang SM, Zhang DW, Zhou LX (2011) Isolation and nitrogen removal characteristics of an aerobic heterotrophic nitrifying-denitrifying bacterium, Bacillus subtilis Al. Bioresour Technol 102: 854-862. [Ref.]
  8. Zhang QL, Liu Y, Ai GM, Miao LL, Zheng HY, et al. (2012) The characteristics of a novel heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterium, Bacillus methylotrophicus strain L7. Bioresour Technol 108: 35-44. [Ref.]
  9. Zhao B, An Q, He YL, Guo JS (2012) N2O and N2 production during heterotrophic nitrification by Alcaligenes faecalis strain NR. Bioresour Technol 116: 379-385. [Ref.]
  10. Joo HS, Hirai M, Shoda M (2005) Nitrification and denitrification in high-strength ammonium by Alcaligenes faecalis. Biotechnol Letts 27: 773-778. [Ref.]
  11. Joo HS, Hirai M, Shoda M (2006) Piggery wastewater treatment using Alcaligenes faecalis strain No.4 with heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification. Water Res 40: 3029-3036. [Ref.]
  12. Shoda M, Ishikawa Y (2014) Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification of high-strength ammonium in anaerobically digested sludge by Alcaligenes faecalis No.4. J Biosci Bioeng 117: 737-741. [Ref.]
  13. Shoda M, Ishikawa Y (2015) Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification of a wastewater from a chemical company by Alcaligenes faecalis No.4. Int J Water Wastewater Treat 1: 1-5. [Ref.]
  14. Kuai L, Verstraete W (1998) Ammonium removal by the oxygenlimited autotrophic nitrification-denitrification system. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4500-4506. [Ref.]
  15. Rostron WM, Stuckey DC, Young AA (2001) Nitrification of highstrength ammonia wastewater: comparative study of immobilized media. Water Res 35: 1169-1178. [Ref.]
  16. Honda N, Hirai M, Ano T, Shoda M (1999) Control of tomato dampingoff caused by Rhizoctonia solani by the heterotrophic nitrifier Alcaligenes faecalis and its product, hydroxylamine. Ann Phytopathol Soc Japan 65:153-162. [Ref.]
  17. O’Brien M, Shoda M, Nishida T, Takahashi J (2013) Synergistic effect of Alcaligenes faecalis and nitrate to reduce in vitro rumen methanogenesis. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture, Dublin, Ireland.

Download Provisional PDF Here

Article Information

Article Type: Research Article

Citation: Shoda M, Ishikawa Y (2016) Utilization of Organic Acid Solution Prepared for HighStrength Ammonium Treatment Using Alcaligenes faecalis No.4. Int J Water Wastewater Treat 2(5): doi http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2381-5299.131

Copyright: © Shoda M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Publication history: 

  • Received date: 31 Aug 2016

  • Accepted date: 20 Oct 2016

  • Published date: 25 Oct 2016
  •